🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.