🔗 Share this article

Initially, Trump seemed to take a strong approach regarding the Ukrainian conflict. After making warnings of "severe repercussions" in August if Russia's president carried on blocking truce talks, Trump finally introduced substantial sanctions on Russia's biggest oil companies, Lukoil and Rosneft. This move seriously impacted Putin's capacity to fund his military invasion in the region.

However, via his newly presented 28-point peace initiative for the conflict, that was developed by American and Russian diplomats without Ukraine's or European participation, he has clearly gone back to his favorable to Russia stance.

Favoring Invasion

Trump's proposal would effectively benefit Putin for occupying Ukraine while putting Ukraine's democratic system in danger. Although strong declarations that "Ukraine's autonomy will be affirmed", much of the initiative in reality compromise that very sovereignty. Seen as a Kremlin dream would probably be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his corporate background, the former president seems to view the situation in Ukraine as a basic border issue, implying giving Russia a part of Ukrainian territory will appease the leader. But, Putin's war is not simply about controlling a damaged area of economically weakened territory in the Donbas region. It is about the nation's democracy – and Putin's apparent intention to weaken it so it no longer serves as an enticing standard for the Russian citizens of the responsible government that his increasing dictatorship withholds them.

Territorial Surrenders

While keeping in position the currently divided Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the initiative would force Ukraine to give up the whole this eastern territory. Beyond favoring the Russian Federation with territory that its forces have been unsuccessful to occupy in exceeding a lengthy period of warfare, this surrender would make Ukrainian defensive positions dangerously weakened.

The area is the site of the nation's well-known "fortress belt", the well-established protective structures that represent a critical impediment to Russian advances. Trump would have Ukraine leave these positions, providing Russian forces a open way to Kyiv if he eventually choose to renew the war.

Defense Reductions

Then, in a step that would enable future fighting simpler for Russia, Trump would mandate the nation to reduce the scale of its armed forces from their present approximately 800,000 soldiers to a maximum of 600,000. Importantly, Trump's initiative imposes no similar restrictions on Russia's military.

In what appears as a concession to Russia's campaign to depict Ukraine's legitimate administration as extremists, the proposal states: "Any Nazi doctrine and practices must be rejected and forbidden." Apparently to emphasize this point, it insists that "The nation will hold political contests in 100 days" of a truce. However, the proposal sets no requirement that Putin endanger his authoritarian rule by holding democratic processes in his own country.

Protection Guarantees

Certainly, the initiative includes the Russian Federation promise not to "enter other states" and to "establish in law its policy of non-aggression towards Europe and Ukraine". Yet considering that the Russian leadership has violated equivalent accords in the previous instances – such as the Budapest accord, in which Russia pledged to honor the nation's territorial integrity in exchange for giving up its historical nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow committed to a ceasefire and a restoration of captured territory in the region to Ukrainian control – why should anyone have confidence in Putin on this occasion?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on external defense commitments. Although the proposal promises a "decisive coordinated military response" in case Russia resume its invasion, and states that "The nation will receive strong defense commitments", the particulars vary from unclear to alarming. The plan would not only block Ukraine Nato membership but also prohibit alliance nations from deploying military personnel on Ukrainian territory, thus precluding the reassurance force, likely commanded by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to prevent Putin from restoring his diminished military, restocking, and attacking again.

World Concern

An additional parallel deal according to sources would grant the nation with a similar to NATO security guarantee, in which any later "significant, deliberate, and sustained armed attack" by Russia on Ukraine "would be considered as an attack endangering the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." This indicates a military response. But different from a powerful national defense – the nation's best protection against future invasion – the effectiveness of the side agreement would depend on the dedication of Nato leaders, such as the US administration, to respond with force to Putin's hostilities, a response they have {not